Monday, June 4, 2018

THE LONDON TIMES AND THE ELM STREET TROLLEY FRANCHISE


James Creelman.

Cortland Evening Standard, Friday, October 11, 1895.

PAGE TWO—EDITORIALS.
The London Times.
   James Creelman contributes to McClure's Magazine the story of the greatest newspaper in the world. For 110 years the Thunderer has been published. Creelman says: "It is the most arrogant, the most unbribable thing in Europe, sober, serene, exasperatingly honest, not to be hurried and not to be delayed, but going its own serious pace, more British than Queen Victoria, more ubiquitous than the Vatican." It is a pity we have not a few more American newspapers "sober, serene and exasperatingly honest."
   In 1785 John Walter first established a paper called The Daily Universal Register. A year later he changed its name to The Times, and The Times it has been ever since. In the very beginning, it was, says Mr. Creelman, "a pugnacious little sheet." Its strength lies in its absolute honesty and its absolute reliability as to news. Severe indeed would be the judgment meted out to the reporter or correspondent who should smuggle into its columns a fake interview or news story. Well it would be for American newspapers if they would study and make their own the source of The Times' influence.
   From the beginning this great paper has been in the hands of one family, father, grandson and great-grandson. The first three were John Walter first, John Walter second, and John Walter third. The present head of the paper is Mr. Arthur Walter. His elder brother, also John, would have been the head had he lived, thus making an unbroken line of Johns.
   It is agreeable to know there are some things money cannot do. Mr. Creelman says that William Waldorf Astor tried to buy the great newspaper. ''How much money will it take to buy The Times?'' asked Mr. Astor.
   ''The money was never coined that can buy The Times,'' replied Mr. Arthur Walter.

   ◘ The new line of freight transportation which has been opened between Galveston and Great Britain will carry goods past Liverpool, through the Manchester ship canal directly to Birmingham. The Manchester Canal company itself is interested in the new venture. Texas cotton will thus pass without reloading or breaking bulk straight through to the mills of Birmingham.
   ◘ It is quite possible that the Defender [America Cup victor] may be the means of bringing much money to Herreshoff, the blind boat builder. A good beginning of getting large contracts has already been made for him in the order from Secretary Herbert for two torpedo boats at $144,000 each. It will not be at all surprising if, besides future orders from the United States government, he should be requested by Japan and other foreign nations to make them torpedo boats too.
   ◘ The right way to get good roads in this country is to make the inmates of county jails and of the state penitentiaries construct them.
   ◘ The bonded debt of every mile of completed railway in this country averages $32,000 and it increases year by year. How many of the roads will ever pay it?


Cortland-Homer Traction Co. baggage car 17 at the A. P. McGraw Corset factory in McGrawville.
The Elm-st. Franchise.
   The application of the Traction company for a franchise to lay and operate a track between Church-st. and Pendleton-st. down Elm, has met with unexpected opposition and seems, unfortunately, to have developed some unpleasant feeling. Any such feeling is totally unnecessary, as the application is simply a business proposition which ought to be presented and opposed, if opposed at all, in a fair, candid and considerate spirit, and decided upon its merits and with due regard to justice to the company as well as to the town and the village. After the original and the adjourned hearings, the issue has been narrowed down to the right and desirability of the Traction company's drawing freight to and from McGrawville.
   While it has been alleged that this proposed drawing of freight has been kept in the dark and is now sprung at a time when the steam road is actually engaged in laying its track to McGrawville—greatly to the detriment of the latter road—the truth is that the promoters of the Traction company declined to acquire franchises or to agree to build to McGrawville unless and until the freight business to and from that place had been secured to them for a term of years. It was a matter of talk about this village, to our personal knowledge, before the work on the McGrawville line was begun that freight contracts had been made by business men of that place with the Traction company, and several months since we talked over the matter of the effect of these contracts on the proposed steam road with one of the most prominent promoters of that road, and he expressed doubt as to the Traction company's right to make such contracts or to carry freight, and gave us the impression that he had much less fear of the freight than of the passenger competition of the trolley line.
   Mr. A. P. McGraw of McGrawville informs us that there was no secrecy whatever about the making of these contracts, that they were only made for a term of three years from their dates and that nearly one year has already expired, and that they do not bind those who signed them to give all of their freight to the Traction company. Mr. McGraw believes that the McGrawville people want both the steam and trolley roads to haul freight, and that competition will be a good thing for the public. We learn from ex-Village President Tisdale also, that before he went out of office Superintendent Dunston told him that the Traction company expected to haul freight in bulk between Cortland and McGrawville, and he supposed it was generally understood that this was the fact before work on the McGrawville branch was started and that freight contracts had been made. All of which shows, that there was nothing secret or unfair in the action of the Traction company in its solicitation or arrangements for freight business.
   Now as to the effect on the company's freight business of the village board's granting the Elm-st. franchise:
   Whatever rights the Traction company has over its road as now built are fixed. If it has the right to haul freight, it can do so if it sees fit. If no right to do a freight business is conferred upon it by the law under which it is organized, no franchise given by the village can create any such right, nor can any act of the village authorities deprive the company of its legal rights. Consequently the village board has the power to do only one of three things—it can grant the franchise on Elm-st. precisely as it has granted the other franchises to the road, or it can refuse to grant it, or can grant it conditionally.
   As we understand the position of the opponents of the franchise, or most of them, they are willing the franchise should be granted if the condition is made that no freight shall be drawn over the Elm-st. branch. If we are mistaken in this we stand open for correction.
   What are the considerations of public convenience, safety and welfare bearing on this question of a conditional or an unconditional franchise?
   We think that no one will deny that the comfort, convenience and safety of passengers on the electric road would be promoted and vexatious delays avoided by another crossing of the D., L. & W. railroad besides the present one at the station. If the village board refuses to grant the Elm-st. franchise as asked for, or if the company refuses to accept a conditional franchise, the result will be that all the freight and passenger traffic on the electric road will have to cross the tracks of the D., L. & W. as at present, and danger and delays be continued—especially in carrying passengers to and from the park. And should any serious accident or loss of life occur at this crossing, there would be many who would be quick to condemn the refusal to grant a franchise for a second crossing. If the Elm-st. franchise is granted and accepted for passenger traffic only, then the freight traffic, though at some inconvenience to the Traction company, will have to go through Railroad-st., and part of the passengers go over this route and part over the Elm-st.
   It is now too late to inquire whether it would not have been wiser when the original franchise was granted to the Traction company to have inserted a clause prohibiting the hauling of freight. The clause was not inserted, and, as stated above, the company therefore has all the rights given by the law under which it was incorporated to any company organizing thereunder. If these rights do not include the right to haul freight, then certainly the granting of an unconditional franchise on Elm-st. will not confer that right on that branch of the road any more than on the part now built.
   It does not seem to us that the interests of the steam railroad to McGrawville will be promoted to any marked degree by refusing the Traction company the privilege of hauling freight through Elm-st. provided it now has the right to haul it over the line as built through Railroad-st., especially as the Traction company's freight contracts hold for only a little more than two years longer. If it were an original question—with the possible building of the steam railroad in view—whether we should allow the trolley road to haul McGrawville freight, and thus cut off to a certain extent one of the inducements to building the steam road and curtail its profits if built, we should say that it would be wise to refuse the Traction company this privilege, even if thereby the project of an electric road to McGrawville had to be abandoned, provided this refusal would assure the building of the steam road.
   But the situation at present is very different from this. The electric road is built to McGrawville on an unconditional franchise, with carrying of freight as one of the inducements to its construction, and with freight contracts made before it was built. If the company has the legal right to carry freight, therefore, all that our village board can now do is to inconvenience the road somewhat in the exercise of this right, while at the same time inconveniencing the public also. We have had intimations that the promoters of the steam road propose to test the right of the trolley road to do a freight business. If they do, and the Traction company is held not to have this right, all its freight contracts go down and it is thenceforth simply a passenger road. And even if it has the right, we doubt whether for freight business to and from McGrawville it can long compete with the Erie & Central New York, and whether after this road is built the McGrawville branch of the electric road will be a profitable one.
   The matter to be decided is not however, whether our village board can now prevent the carrying of freight by the electric road between McGrawville and Cortland. It the road could ever get this right it has it now. The question is solely whether freight, if it goes at all by trolley, shall go through Elm or Railroad-st., and whether the convenience of both company and public shall be subserved—subject of course to the Traction company's getting the consent of the necessary amount of property on Elm-st, which seems to have been secured already.
   Had the franchise through Elm-st. been asked for when the original franchise was sought, no one will question that it would have been granted. Why then should it be refused now, after the company has bridged the Tioughnioga [river] at its own expense, when it had the right to cross the Port Watson bridge, and after it has given to Cortland what it has long wanted and would probably otherwise never have had—a beautiful public park, which has been visited and enjoyed this year by thousands.
   We have no desire or intention to differ unpleasantly with those holding opposite views, or to argue the case of the Traction company as against the interests of the village, town or steam railroad, but we believe that the considerations above suggested should have due weight, not only with our village board in deciding this question, but with our citizens in forming public sentiment.

Charles E. Parker.
SUPREME COURT
And Court of Oyer and Terminer, Justice Parker Presiding.
   The case of William C. Keating vs. George Fitts went to the jury last night who were out all night and came in at 9 o'clock this morning for instructions from the court. They again retired and at 10:45 reported a verdict for plaintiff of $1,841.67. At the bringing in of the verdict defendants' attorney made a motion for a new trial on the minutes which was denied and the defendant was given ninety days in which to make a case and exceptions, and execution was stayed upon the judgment for that purpose. The plaintiff was allowed a like time to prepare his amendments. The cross examination of Mr. Fitts by John Courtney, Jr., and the summing up of the case for the plaintiff by O. U. Kellogg were special features of this term of court.
   The following cases are over the term: William Connors vs. Cyrus Worlook. J. & T. E. Courtney for plaintiff. Kellogg & Van Hoesen for defendant. 
   William A. Howard vs. Harrison Wells. Dougherty & Miller for plaintiff. H. L. Gleason for defendant.
   William Howe and others vs. William H. Clark, Frank W. Collins, and James M. Milne. Smith & Dickinson for plaintiff. B. T. Wright for defendants.
   Charles Rowe vs. Byron Maxon et al. Dougherty & Miller for plaintiff. Kellogg & Van Hoesen for defendant.
   William Howe, Hezekiah Howe and Sophia A. Howe vs. Frank W. Collins, William H. Clark and James M. Milne. Smith & Dickinson for plaintiffs. B. T. Wright for defendants.
   Howard R. Meacham vs. Cortland STANDARD Printing Co. [Alleged libel.] N. L. Miller for plaintiff. W. J. Mantanye for defendant.
   The grand jury reported indictments against W. H. Olmstead and John Andrews for keeping and permitting a gambling room at the Central House.
   David Finn was indicted for assault in the second degree upon the person of John Murphy, Jr., near the E., C. & N. roundhouse [Owego Street].
   No indictment was found against John McDonald, charged with the murder of Patrick Quinlan.
   No indictment was found against George Scott charged with burglary at Little York.
   Court then adjourned sine die.

Death of Mrs. Laura Cooper.
   Mrs. Laura Cooper, widow of the late Gilbert Cooper, died at 8:30 o'clock this morning at the residence of her son, Mr. Lester Cooper, 36 River-st., after an illness of nearly two years from dropsy. She was formerly Miss Laura Yale and was born at Guilford, Chenango Co., April 3, 1820, and her early life was spent in Guilford. On Nov. 11, 1841, she was married to Mr. Gilbert Cooper and they lived in Smithville, Chenango Co., for sixteen years when they removed to Cortland, where the remainder of their life was spent. Mr. Cooper's death occurred Oct. 29, 1894.
   Mrs. Cooper was one of the largest hearted, most generous of women, and was a remarkably kind neighbor. She was always eager to be of assistance to someone. She was fond of children and had a way of making the children fond of her. Her friends and neighbors old and young have sustained a severe loss in her death,
   Mrs. Cooper leaves two sons, Messrs. Lester and George Cooper of Cortland, two sisters, Mrs. William Cooley and Miss Lorana Yale of Binghamton, and two brothers, Ransom Yale of Upper Lisle and Albert Yale of the state of Wyoming.
   Funeral services will be held from her late residence at 2 o'clock P. M. Monday, interment in Cortland Rural cemetery.





BREVITIES.
   —F. M. Quick is using a cane to-day as a result of a sprain of his right knee while at work in his store yesterday.
   —The chairman of the new Prohibition county committee is E. M. Van Hoesen and the secretary Adolph Frost, Jr.
   —Chief of Police Linderman found a bicycle on North Main-st. last night which is in his possession awaiting its owner.
   —The dancing school at McGrawville will open at the town hall Tuesday evening. All members of the class will meet at 7:30 o'clock for first rehearsal.
   —Eighty-three tickets were sold yesterday for the trolley excursion from Homer to McGrawville and return for the benefit of the Old Ladies' Home at Homer.
   —At the regular meeting of Canton Cortland, No. 27, I. O. O. F., held last night, the degrees were conferred upon three Odd Fellows from Marathon. An invitation was received and accepted from Marathon Lodge, No. 147, to attend the dedication of their new hall next Wednesday afternoon and evening. The Grand Master of the state will have charge of the ceremony.
   —An Oneida man was put off a New York Central train recently because his ticket was three days old, though it had never been used, and he refused to pay his fare again. The amount in question was only twelve cents. He declares he will bring an action against the road to test their new ruling that a ticket can be used only on the date of issue. He claims that a first-class, unlimited ticket is good until used, that the railroad has no right to make such a ruling. The outcome will be watched for with interest by all.

GRAND UNION TEA STORE.
Repaired and Renovated—Concert To-morrow Night.
   At 32 Main-st. is located one of the branch stores of the Grand Union Tea Co. This store is in charge of Mr. F. M. Quick and under his able management a large trade has been built up at this place. The store has recently undergone a thorough renovation and re-arrangement which makes it one of the neatest business places in town. On entering the store one sees at the right three large pyramidal display stands on which are most tastily arranged lamps, decorated and Japanese china ware. On the wall at the right are two large panel pictures of Japanese scenery which add very much to the beauty and attractiveness of the place.
   People on entering are met and waited upon either by Mr. Quick himself in his most polite manner, or by one of the two obliging clerks, Miss Lottie Hardy or Mr. W. D. Taylor.
   To-morrow occurs the grand fall opening at this store and in the evening Daniel's orchestra will be present and furnish music.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment