Sunday, September 30, 2018

NO THOUGHT OF GIVING UP THE CITIZENS' MOVEMENT



Cortland Semi-Weekly Standard, Friday, February 14, 1896.

DEPARTMENT OF GOOD GOVERNMENT.
NO THOUGHT OF GIVING UP THE CITIZENS' MOVEMENT.
   About two months ago, two or three gentlemen who had favored the citizens’ ticket last year began to express the opinion that such had been the change in the feelings of some of the Republican leaders that a good government Republican ticket could now be nominated and elected. For these weeks these gentlemen have most earnestly advocated that course and declared there would be no citizens’ ticket this year. A few days ago several good government Republicans got together to consider whether the course of these gentlemen had forestalled a citizens’ ticket, and if indeed there was a disposition to favor a party ticket. At this meeting Mr. C. P. Walrad, president of the Good Government, most strongly and unequivocally advocated a citizens’ ticket, as did all the rest present. This meeting, however, was entirely informal and did not assume to decide anything or work out any course of action.
   The meeting last night was called by the citizens’ village committee for the purpose of getting the views of representative good government men of all parties as to a citizens’ ticket and calling the caucuses. There were present twenty-six persons, manufacturers, merchants, physicians, professors and shop men of all political parties. Every man expressed his views. Every man was pronounced in his opinion that the good government movement for the enforcement of law can and must go on, and that it is the popular demand that a citizens’ ticket be nominated again this year. If there was any exception to this view it was that expressed by Rev. Mr. Pearce, who thought it might be well not to put up a citizens’ ticket if a party ticket should be named with well-known good government men as candidates for president and trustees, and if such a ticket should be elected and the officers thus elected should fail to do their best to continue the enforcement of law against gambling, prostitution and the illegal sale of liquor, then next year put up a citizens’ ticket and again sweep the field, and hold it till the reform is secure. But being entirely alone in this sentiment, Mr. Pearce united with the rest to make unanimous the sentiment of the meeting to put a citizens’ ticket in the field. There was a feeling expressed that if a party ticket should be early nominated containing the names of men of undoubted good government sentiments as nominees for president and trustees, it would be well to endorse such nominees in the citizens’ ticket.
   This meeting was unanimous, among other things, in the following views:
That municipal interests and moral reform should not be made subjects of political party strife; that in these local and most important affairs all good citizens of all parties should unite; that the citizens’ movement has accomplished in one year more than was expected by its friends; that public sentiment demands the prosecution of this work; that the men who are trying to “side track,” this movement are, with a few honorable exceptions, the same men who for years have been the friends of the saloons and were last year the open enemies of the citizens’ movement; that wherever there has been made a strong appeal to our people in behalf of law or order, good citizens have been found to be in the vast majority, and that to hand this half accomplished reform over to a political party, or to a faction of a political party, would be to shut out from the movement all who do not happen to belong to that political party.
LIGHT BREAKING IN.
   It is now coming to light that, in the desperate effort to get our best citizens into the movement to rescue the saloons by nominating a candidate to run against Mr. J. W. Keese, men were put on the list of “thirty” who refused to let these names go on that list, and were not present at the meeting, some of whom are going to vote for Mr. Keese. We know two of whom this is true. This shows the animus of the whole rescue movement. Such methods must react upon the heads of the men who employ them. Our better citizens must sooner or later see through these devices and awake to the fact that saloonism is playing a bold game to entrap good people. Mr. Hudson is a good man. But what does he stand for? Not for no-license, for already just as good a man was in nomination pledged to that sentiment. Not for high license, for the excise commissioners cannot change the law on that point. Not for reducing the number of saloons to a few, for the great body of saloonkeepers and their friends would fight him in that case and, with the temperance people and the majority of the liquor men against him he would certainly fail of election overwhelmingly. He is too wise a man to stand up and be knocked down in that way. Plainly, whether he sees it or not, he stands for license in the old style that prevailed here a few years ago, with all its direful results.
THE SEARCH FOR A CANDIDATE.
   We sincerely hope that some such man as Mr. G. P. Walrad or Mr. H. F. Benton can be induced to accept the nomination for president of the village on the Republican ticket. We feel sure, however, that neither of these men will accept. We ask every friend of law and order to scan carefully the movement in bringing such men up. If they were suggested and urged mainly by Republicans who have known sympathies with law enforcement it would be a hopeful sign, but we greatly fear that the most determined and persistent enemies of the reform movement are at the bottom of this effort to put good men forward, and that for no good purpose. If, however, two trustees of right views should be put on that ticket, we should feel far more hopeful that our cause would not suffer.
   As Mr. Benton has said, it is most important that there be elected the right kind of trustees. To give us a good president and a village board unwilling to push the good government work would be a disaster.

Mr. Benton Declines.
CORTLAND, N. Y., Feb. 13, 1896.
   To the Editor of the Standard:
   Sir—From an item in your paper of Feb. 11, I think the people are getting the impression that I would accept the nomination for president of the village.
   While I am grateful for the expressed confidence manifested yet my business is such that I must positively refuse to accept the nomination to such a position for the coming year.
   Respectively yours,
   H. F. BENTON.

"Jan." is a misprint.
PAGE FOUR—EDITORIALS.
The Excise Commissionership.
   Before any voter of the town of Cortlandville decides as to where he will cast his vote for commissioner of excise next Tuesday, there are several facts which he should carefully consider.
   1st. The excise board now stands solidly no-license, every one of its three members having been elected on this issue.
   2d. The election of a commissioner favoring license could therefore have no possible effect upon the granting of licenses in this village for the coming year, even if the office of commissioner of excise should be continued.
   3d. There is every human probability that the Raines bill now before the legislature will pass and receive the governor’s signature. If this bill becomes a law, excise boards will be abolished, the people of the town will vote direct on the question of whether liquor shall be sold within its limits, and if the vote is favorable to selling, the [business] concerns which sell will be compelled to pay a heavy tax, and violations of the law will be prosecuted with a rigor never before known, and at the public expense.
   Under these circumstances it might be asked why either the friends or the enemies of license in this town should nominate a candidate for excise commissioner, so long as there is no promise that the election would have the slightest effect so far as the present granting of licenses is concerned. As to the nomination of Mr. Keese by the no license caucus, it may be said that he is the commissioner whose term is about to expire, that he has been faithful to his pledges, has made an excellent officer and has commanded the confidence and respect of the entire community—of those who agree with him in his opinions as to license as well as those who oppose him. He has deserved the endorsement of a renomination and has received it.
   But more than this and far more important, Mr. Keese stands as a representative of the law prohibiting the sale of liquor in this community, a law which has been and still is being shamefully and defiantly violated. Violations of the Sunday liquor laws even in the city of New York have not been so flagrant and constant as have the unlawful sales of liquor in this village—and every man, woman and child in Cortland knows it. When the town was under license the law was far less respected even than now. Those who had no-license sold just as freely and just as unmolested as those who had, and many, if not all, of those who had license paid no attention whatever to the restrictions of the law, The state of affairs grew to be so scandalous that the people declared emphatically for no-license, and have done so at every town election for the last three years, and last year a village citizens’ ticket was elected on the sole issue of enforcing the laws against the sale of liquor. A determined effort has been made during the past year to enforce these laws, and with greater success than has ever attended any previous efforts—a success which we are free to confess we did not anticipate. Twice before we had seen the people roused to attack the unlawful liquor traffic, and twice, in spite of earnest and conscientious effort, the conclusion had been lame and impotent and the state of affairs had grown steadily worse. But the last year has shown tangible results—over $1,400 turned into the village treasury eight or ten saloons closed, three ex-saloonkeepers working together in one shop, one defiant liquor seller sent to the penitentiary on conviction of a second offense, the sale of liquor materially lessened, and violators of the liquor law generally put in terror lest they should suffer imprisonment as well as fines. These prosecutions, though carried on partially under village authority, have been largely conducted, and the heavy expenses connected with them paid by private individuals, both members of the Good Government club and non-members as well.
   The nomination of Mr. Keese has been made by the men who have been engaged in this honorable, public-spirited and unselfish attempt to enforce the law against a great and insolent, public wrong. He represents in his candidacy this effort more than anything else. His election would not mean simply or chiefly that the residents of this town and village favor no-license, but it would mean that they favor the maintenance and enforcement of righteous, though insulted law; that they believe that the fairly declared will of the people as to the prohibition of the sale of liquor should be respected; that they endorse the action of the men who have contributed time, money and effort, and sacrificed business interests to uphold the cause of good citizenship and good government, This is the appeal which Mr. Keese’s candidacy makes to the citizens of this town, and it is an appeal which ought not to be made to any man in vain—whether an advocate of license or no-license—who believes that, law as law, is entitled to respect and obedience.
   Mr. Keese’s defeat would be regarded by every illegal liquor seller and by every sympathizer with the violation of law as a rebuke to the Good Government movement of the past year, as a declaration by the people that they are sick of the attempt to suppress the evil which at three successive town meetings they have condemned, that they are willing the law, which they themselves have set up, shall be trampled on under their very eyes, and that they are willing this village should return to its former condition, when every one who wanted to sell whisky sold it, and when no one said any one nay.
   The personality of the license and no-license candidates does not enter into this matter in any way, nor does it signify anything that both have respectable and well-meaning citizens among their supporters. The issue is clearly and sharply made, and if the candidates themselves desired ever so earnestly to change it they could not. The force of the situation, the logic of events, make the question for each voter to settle, when he comes to decide as to his vote for excise commissioner, simply this: Shall I cast in my lot with those who believe in upholding, and are striving to uphold, the majesty of the law, or shall I vote with the consciousness that, while some good men are acting with me, I have also as associates every dealer who has violated the liquor law during the past year, every citizen who has sympathized with the violation, and every voter who believes that it is an inalienable right of all mankind to make drink and sell whisky without [law] or hindrance.
 

Saturday, September 29, 2018

CENTENARIAN DANIEL A. THOMPSON AND CORTLAND HOSPITAL REPORT



Cortland Semi-Weekly Standard, Tuesday, February 11, 1896.

ONE HUNDRED YEARS OLD.
DANIEL A. THOMPSON OF MCGRAWVILLE
Will Pass the Century Mark on Thursday, Feb. 13—Sketch of His Life.
   To comparatively few people is it given to reach the age of one hundred years.  A still smaller number reach it in good health and in the possession of physical and mental vigor. Within a few years Cortland county has had three residents who have celebrated their one hundredth birthday; Mrs. Sarah Chaplin Rockwood of Cortland celebrated her one hundredth birthday on Nov. 8, 1885, and died Nov. 26, 1889, being 104 years and 18 days old. Mr. Hosea Sprague of Homer celebrated his centennial on Dec. 28, 1893 and died July 19, 1895, at the age of 101 years, 6 months and 21 days. Mrs. Ora Brown of Cortland was one hundred years old on Jan. 31, 1894, and died twenty-six days later, at the age of 100 years and 26 days.
   There is a fourth claimant for centennial honors in the person of Daniel A. Thompson of McGrawville whose cut we publish to-day and who will celebrate his one hundredth birthday on Thursday of this week, Feb. 13, 1896. Mr. Thompson is one of the pioneers of this region and one of the founders of McGrawville.
   A STANDARD reporter called at his home to get a little sketch of the life and career of this aged gentleman. He was politely treated and was shown the old Bible with its family record and other records and papers.
   In Chatham, Columbia Co., N. Y., there lived in the last century a sturdy pioneer, John Thompson by name, who was the father of some twenty children, he having been several times married.  By one wife he had nine children, the sixth of which in genealogical order was the subject of this sketch, Daniel A. Thompson, who was born in Chatham, Feb. 13, 1796. While a boy he determined to learn the blacksmith’s trade and was apprenticed to John Merrill who had married a cousin of the boy. As the section along the Hudson river was quite thickly settled, Mr. Merrill decided to emigrate to a new country and came to this town (then Homer township) and built a blacksmith shop near the present residence of Reuben Brown on the Cortland road.
   Mr. Thompson soon followed him, coming in 1816 and finished his apprenticeship in the shop, the location of which is marked by a large stone, which still covers the old well. When he had finished his apprenticeship he worked for a while in a gun shop in Cortland and then came to this place, building a log shop near where the house of John Gilbertson now stands on Clinton-st. This shop burned and was replaced by a frame building which was afterward torn down,
   On June 15, 1820, he was married to Miss Sally Frink who had moved upon the present Thompson farm with her mother and stepfather, Nehemiah Lewis. About that time he bought an acre of ground on the west side of the Freetown road (now Clinton-st.), running from the creek to where Frank Webster’s residence now stands. This he afterwards sold and then moved to Schuyler county where he purchased a farm and remained two years. Then be returned to McGrawville and bought the farm now owned by Samuel Doud. He sold this farm and in 1835 purchased the house where he now resides, having his shop in the building now used by Lewis Warren as a barn and later in a building near the Clinton-st. bridge until he purchased the land on the east side of Clinton-st. extending from the old cemetery to the old M. E. parsonage (now J. J. Isaacs’ residence) and there built a shop on the site of the one now owned by him and in which he carried on his trade up to a few years ago. Mrs. Thompson, his wife, died in 1887, aged 87 years.
   Mr. and Mrs. Thompson were the parents of eight children: Albert E., born
July 16, 1822, who emigrated to Pennsylvania, where he married Sarah Kitchen. He died in Muncy in that state in 1876. Clarissa A., born Jan. 19, 1826, who died Aug. 12, 1830. Lewis A., born May 19, 1830, who married Eunice Madison and died in Salisbury, Mo., in 1883. Clarissa A. (2d), born Oct. 10, 1831, who married Ned Whipple and died in California in 1873. Mary Jeanette, born Aug. 28, 1833, who married Seneca Mudge and died in McGrawville, April 6, 1895. Fannie I., born Aug. 8, 1835, and died July 31, 1843.  Sallie Roselia, born Sept. 1, 1837, who married Charles Woodworth and died in Virginia City, Nev., in 1886. A. P. Thompson, who was born Nov. 10, 1842, and who is the only surviving child. The grandchildren living are Alonzo H. Mudge of Cortland and Daniel and Will Thompson, sons of A. P. Thompson, the former of whom is partner in a marble yard in Brighton, Mich., and the latter a photographer in Chicago, Ill. Of the great grand children there are Albert, Alonzo, Belle, Ernest and Enos Mudge and Earl, Nettie and Sarah Leach, all grandchildren of Seneca and Jeneatte Mudge.
   Mr. Thompson resides in the house he purchased over sixty years ago and is cared for by his son, A. P. Thompson, and son-in-law Seneca Mudge. His great grandchildren, Albert and Alonzo Mudge and Earl Leach also reside with them. He is confined to the house by the wintry weather, but in the summer months spends much of his time out of doors walking around without a cane or other assistance, He does not wear glasses, although at one time he could not see to do his work without them. One day some thirty years ago while working at his anvil he found that he could not see through them and upon removing them found that his sight had returned to him. He has often of late years in a joking manner referred to a fortune-teller having told him when but thirteen years of age that he would live to be one hundred and but a few days ago told his son that he guessed he would do so.
   The old Empire block is one of the buildings erected by Mr. Thompson, who, coming to McGrawville but seven years later than its god-father, Samuel McGraw, helped to lay the foundations of the present thriving city of corsets.

SOBRIETY AND GOOD ORDER.
WATCHWORDS OF THE EXCISE NOMINEE.
H. S. Hudson States His Position in the Coming Excise Campaign in This Town.
   A STANDARD reporter Monday morning called upon Mr. H. S. Hudson, who Saturday was chosen by the committee of thirty business men to represent them as a candidate for excise commissioner in the coming election, and asked him if he would state his position in the campaign…and if elected, so that all might be able to vote upon the question intelligently and understandingly. Mr. Hudson at first replied that he had nothing to say, he had stated his position to the committee who had called upon him and he referred the reporter to that committee. “Go and see George W. Warren,” he said, “he will tell you what I said to them.”
   Subsequently in answer to questions, Mr. Hudson said that he told the committee when they came to him that he didn’t want the office, why did they come to him? When they had replies that they didn’t believe that he had an enemy in Cortland and that no one would vote against him on personal grounds, he said to them that if their statement was true he would be foolish indeed if he took the office, for if elected he would undoubtedly have hundreds of enemies before the year is over. They persisted in their efforts to persuade him and finally he yielded, but said to them that he would not ask any one to vote for him, would not say a word to any one to assist in his election, would not spend a cent to secure it. He would not give to them or to any one else any pledge as to what he would do or what he would not do.
   He should be governed by circumstances but he would always be found on the side of sobriety and good order. He believed that he was public spirited. If he was not he certainly should not have accepted this nomination. We had had an opportunity here in Cortland of seeing two extremes in the excise question and both of them had been absolute failures. He believed in being conservative in all things, particularly in this thing. It is a difficult matter to handle. But he thought that when the commissioners made a rule of any kind it should be lived up to absolutely. There can be no intimidation in my case, said Mr. Hudson. Any one who would try that would find me more stubborn than a government mule. You can lead one of those along first rate with nubbins of corn, but you can’t budge one of them an inch with a club.  If I am a member of the excise board and we make a rule or regulation, we will carry it through or “bust.”
   Mr. Hudson declined to say more, remarking that he had already said more than he had intended to, but referred the reporter to the committee.
   Mr. George L. Warren was interrogated in regard to what Mr. Hudson had said to them, and in his reply he stated substantially the same things that Mr.
Hudson had said. In addition he said that Mr. Hudson had told them that he was not a saloon man in any sense of the word and that he had never been inside of but two saloons in Cortland in his life and then stepped in for a moment only and went right out again.
   Mr. Warren also commented upon the representative character of the citizens and business men who were present at the meeting at Fireman’s hall Friday night. Mr. Warren did not think that a liquor dealer was there, he was sure he did not see any, but they were almost wholly merchants and professional men along Main-st.

COMPLICATED AFFAIRS.
THE SHERIFF IS IN POSSESSION AND HE ISN’T.
New Moves in Hitchcock Mfg Co. Checker Board—Receivers Reappointed and Injunction Served.
(From the Daily Standard of Friday.)
   Affairs of the Hitchcock Mfg. Co. are in a highly complicated state, though opposing lawyers say that there is no complication and that everything is perfectly plain. The difficulty is that they do not see it alike, and what one side says is absolutely correct the other says is all nonsense. Complications are increasing with each day and almost with each hour, and it is now quite certain that only the courts will be able to straighten out the difficulties.
   Yesterday morning, as was stated in The STANDARD last night, Daugherty & Miller received a telegram from Albany announcing that the appellate division of the supreme court had set aside the receivers of the Hitchcock Mfg. Co., C. E. Hitchcock and James Devine. Immediately they issued executions against the company for sums aggregating nearly $20,000, put them in the hands of Sheriff Hilsinger who took possession of the Elm-st. factories and of the foundry and machine shop on Port Watson-st. The order of the court had not been received in Cortland at the time and did not come until this morning.
   As soon as this was done word was sent to Syracuse by the receivers to their attorney, J. William Wilson, who at 1:30 o’clock appeared before Judge Forbes at Canastota with a petition for the appointment of new receivers for the Hitchcock Mfg. Co. The petition which he presented was the same one bearing the date of July 12, 1895, that was used last summer to procure the appointment of the original receivers, but it was strengthened by four additional affidavits: One of Caleb B. Hitchcock bearing date of Nov. 22, 1895: one of James Devine bearing date of Nov. 23, 1895; one of Henry L. Gleason bearing date of Feb. 1, 1896; and one of J. William Wilson bearing date of Feb. 4, 1896. Upon the strength of this petition and the affidavits Judge Forbes reappointed C. B. Hitchcock and James Devine the receivers of the company, and also granted an injunction order restraining all parties from bringing any actions against the company.
   Judge Forbes’ appointments and the injunction order were filed at the county clerk’s office at 9 o’clock this morning, and a copy was served upon Dougherty & Miller. At 9:50 o’clock the order of the appellate division of the supreme court was filed by Dougherty & Miller. This is the order which vacates all of Judge Forbes’ previous orders and sets aside the receivers.
   If Judge Forbes’ order which was filed first takes precedence, the receivers are still in possession and the sheriff is not in possession. If the order of the appellate division of the supreme court, which bears the earlier date, taken precedence, the receivers are set aside and Judge Forbes’ later order is void. Sheriff Hilsinger says he is in possession.
   Dougherty & Miller say that the sheriff is in possession and that the matter of the sequence in filing the orders does not count; that before Judge Forbes granted his order yesterday afternoon reappointing the receivers the executions had been issued and served and that they act as a lien upon the property inside of anything else that can be found. They claim that they will appear before the court with a motion to set aside the injunction and they believe the motion will be granted promptly on the strength of their decision from the appellate division; and furthermore they say that if the sheriff gives up his possession they will sue him and recover from his bondsmen.
   The receivers of the company claim that section 626 of the Code of Civil
Procedure provides that an order vacating or modifying an injunction order must be entered and served on the opposite party before the order takes effect. The order permitting the Second National bank and others to enter judgments simply permitted them to enter the judgments and said that all other proceedings therein, thereunder and thereafter were stayed and enjoined until the further action of the court. That order was never vacated or modified and is still in force and consequently Dougherty & Miller had no right to enter executions, and the executions were irregular and consequently void and will undoubtedly be set aside and the parties entering them are in contempt of court for violating the provisions of the order. The original order of Judge Forbes was in force until the order from the appellate division could be entered and served, and before that order was entered and served, a new order from Judge Forbes was entered and served, and consequently the order of the appellate division has no force in this case.
   The receivers also claim that the sheriff is not in possession and never has been. They refused to surrender their keys to him and he is now restrained from interfering with them in any way. The parties for whom he purported to act will get no preference from their executions, and there has been no time since the original appointment of receivers when the property has not been under the control of the court and in the hands of the receivers.
   Attorney Gridley of the firm of Miller, Gridley & Pratt of Syracuse appeared in Cortland this morning and issued and caused to be served an attachment on the property of the Hitchcock Mfg. Co for about $14,000 in behalf of the Salt Springs National bank of Syracuse. The receivers deny that an attachment was placed upon the property. They say that the Gridley attachment was not served until after the order of Judge Forbes was entered, that by this order all persons were restrained from commencing any action against the company or taking any steps looking toward an attachment.
   These are some of the legal difficulties which have arisen and which probably only the courts can settle.
   It is understood that another party in Cortland stood ready to issue attachments upon the property for some $28,000, but that he decided not to do so because he believed that the decision of the appellate division setting aside the receivers would not stand against the later order of Judge Forbes which was filed first.
   Just before The STANDARD went to press this afternoon a reporter inquired again of Sheriff Hilsinger whether or not he was in possession of the Hitchcock plant. He replied that he was and intended to hold that possession until he was put out.

No Change in Affairs.
   There was no change in the affairs of the Hitchcock Mfg. Co. Monday. Both sides claim the possession of the works. A STANDARD reporter visited the Elm-st. factory in the afternoon and found Mr. C. B. Hitchcock, one of the receivers, and a number of bookkeepers at work in the office and the sheriff out in the factory, where he said he was looking after some matters.
   Mr. E. L. Dodd, bookkeeper at the foundry plant, told a reporter that Mr.
James Devine of Syracuse, the other receiver, was in town Saturday and told him to direct the men to go to work again in the foundry Monday morning as usual. He followed orders and gave the directions, but none of the men went to work. They were all afraid of being in contempt of court or of otherwise breaking a law or a rule or regulation.
HOMER.
Gleanings of News From Our Twin Village.
   Homer, Jan. 10.—William Hine died at the home of his daughter, Miss Nellie Hine, in this village, Feb 4, 1896, in the ninety-fourth year of his age. He was a man of remarkable vigor, both of mind and body, and always led an active and energetic life. Mr. Hine  was born in Ridgefield, Conn., Jan. 18, 1802. In his early boyhood his parents removed to Hillsdale, Columbia Co., N. Y. In 1830 he was united in marriage to Phebe Webster, daughter of Jebiel and Phebe Webster of Preble, N. Y. In 1862 he removed with his family to Cortland, where he resided twenty-eight years. In 1890 he came to Homer, where he resided up to his death. In politics he was a Whig up to the time of the organization of the Republican party, which at once won his sympathy and hearty support. Of his party he was an intelligent and earnest supporter throughout the remainder of his life. He never missed voting at a presidential election. The most of his boyhood days were spent in the South with his sister. His wife died Sept. 14, 1856, aged 46 years. Four daughters survive him: Miss Nellie Hine, Mrs. W. N. Brockway, Mrs. Anna Spoor and Mrs. Sarah Thompson, all of Homer, and five grandchildren, viz. Anna Hine Thompson, Mrs. Florence Maxson, Mrs. Josephine Starin, Mrs. Fannie Thompson and Mr. Geo A. Brockway. There are three great grandchildren, Russell & William Brockway and Edith Jan Maxson.

THE ICE CARNIVAL.
Large Crowd at the Rink Saturday Night.
   From 6:30 o’clock to 9:30 o’clock Saturday night every trolley car going to the rink was loaded to its utmost capacity. Homer sent a large delegation and so did McGrawville. The Cortland City band was there and furnished fine music throughout the evening. The carnival was under the auspices of the Cortland Athletic association and was a grand success, notwithstanding the fact that only six hours’ notice had been given that it would take place Saturday night.
   At 9 o’clock the grand march began with over one hundred skaters in line, nearly half of whom were masked. The costumes were very beautiful and in most cases the disguise was perfect. The judges, Hon. R. T. Peck, T. H. Dowd and G. J. Maycumber had difficulty in awarding the prizes to the best costumed lady and gentleman. The prizes were, however, awarded to Miss Bernice Rowe and Mr. Eddie Reed respectively.
   The next on the program was the races.
   The 100-yard dash open to club members only was won by A. K. Weatherwax with Harry Moul second. Time 13 seconds.
   200-yard dash open: L. J. Dudley won, L. E. Edgcomb second. Time 22 1-2    seconds.
   200-yard dash open to club members: A. K. Weatherwax won, Harry Moul
Second. Time 21 4-5 seconds.
   Exhibition of fancy skating: George Culp won. Louie Moul second.
   This closed the first ice carnival held in Cortland which was a highly successful affair. So many people have expressed regrets that the time was so short they had no time to get their costumes in readiness, that another entertainment of the same sort is being talked of for Tuesday evening, Feb. 18.

Cortland Hospital on North Main Street.
CORTLAND HOSPITAL.
SECRETARY’ S REPORT.
   The following report of the Cortland hospital for the year ending Feb. 3, 1896, is respectfully submitted:
   During the year, the board of managers has held regular monthly meetings.
The attendance upon these meetings, the devotion to prescribed lines of work, no less than the success of new enterprises, has made this year exceptional in the history of the association.
   The removal of the hospital from its temporary quarters [Clayton Ave.] to the newly purchased [North Main Street] building at the beginning of the year, cleared the way of many obstacles that had hitherto hampered the work, and inaugurated a new era of prosperity.
   The whole number of cases treated since the hospital opened five years ago is 172. The number during the past year is 68--37 males and 81 females. Of this number 44 were medical and 24 surgical cases; 12 of the latter being accident cases; 32 have been discharged cured; 13 improved; 10 unimproved; 7 have died; 2 have been born; and 5 are in the hospital at the present time. The whole number of days occupancy has been 2,079; a daily average of nearly 6 patients. The number of private patients has been 29: ward patients 39. The number who have been able to make some remuneration for their care has been 45; county patients 11, and beneficiaries 12.
   Of the patients treated 37 were from the town of Cortlandville, 8 from Homer, 4 from Truxton, 3 from Preble. 2 from Scott, 1 each from Rochester, Syracuse, Hamilton, Windsor, McLean, LaFayette, DeRuyter, Spafford, Marcellus, Mecklenberg, Cincinnatus, Summerhill, South Otselic, and one without a home.
   Death has resulted from the following causes: consumption, 3; secondary cancer, 1; intestinal obstruction, 1; railroad accident 1; old age, 1.
   The physicians in attendance have been Doctors Dana, Didama, Gazlay,
Henry, Higgins, Johnson, Reese, Santee, Sornberger and White of Cortland;
Robinson and Goodell of Homer, and Hinman of East Homer.
   In December Miss Maynard resigned as matron and head nurse, and Mrs.
Mary S. Banks, a graduate of the New York hospital, was engaged to fill her
place.
   The training school for nurses, now nearing the close of its second year, numbers at the present time four students. This has proven an important auxiliary to the work. Frequent calls for outside nursing have been received. These have been responded to in nineteen instances, whenever the service of the hospital permitted.
   While there has been a steady increase in income, the hospital with its added expenses, has been far from self-supporting, and the ways and means for its maintenance have been a constantly recurring problem. The opening reception and supper netted the association about $200; the Normal school alumni banquet, $90; the sale of refreshments at the opening of the Cortland park, $70.71; business man’s baseball game, $84.56; ice-cream sale, $45; school donations, a large amount of household supplies and $21.09 in money; from the sale of the Industrial Edition of the Cortland STANDARD, $341.10. Individual gifts of money and varied useful articles, as seen by the monthly reports, show that kind friends still have the interest of the cause at heart.
   The offer of Mr. E. D. Crosley of Scott, to be the fiftieth person to pay an annual subscription of $5 to the hospital for five years, or the twenty-fifth person to pay the sum of $25, through the untiring efforts of the Cortland STANDARD and the board of managers, assisted by other friends, resulted in obtaining fifty-six annual $5 subscriptions for five years. In several instances the whole sum of $25 has been paid. A large increase in  the annual receipts is thus assured.
   To Mrs. Eliza Rose Palmer the association is indebted for a gift of $500. This aid was most timely in furnishing the means for the completion of much needed improvements, Notice has been received that the hospital will receive another gift of $500, by the will of the late Mrs. Mary E. Goodrich.
   Thanks are due the physicians who have given their services gratuitously to the treatment of the ward patients, to the Cortland STANDARD Printing Co. for the substantial benefit received through the Industrial Edition, and for the continuance of past favors, to the Cortland Democrat for the year’s subscription, and the unfailing courtesy shown in the use of its columns, to the Syracuse Herald for its subscription, to Mr. M. B. Howes for his services in preparing plumbing specifications; to County Clerk Palmer, and Messrs.
Lewis Bouton and Henry A. Dickinson for legal services; to the Cortland Water Works Co., and to all friends who have in any way contributed to the success of the hospital during the past year, the association extends thanks.
   It is a matter of pride to those entrusted with this work, that the close of the fifth year should find a hospital in Cortland that so fully meets the present demands, and merits the growing appreciation of the public. The building is desirably located, commodious, and furnished with all necessary repairs and equipment. Accommodations for both ward and private patients are ample; the rooms being large, well lighted and furnished with steam heat throughout.
An operating room in the surgical ward is kept in readiness for any emergency that may arise. No pains have been spared in the selection of those placed in charge, and it is the constant aim of the board of managers to see to it that in every department the affairs are wisely and carefully administered.
   In addition to the Harry Merrick Beach memorial room two others have been furnished during the year, the surgical room by Mrs. Louisa A. Schermerhorn of Homer, for whom it is named, and another, known as the “Normal Room,” has been furnished by the faculty of the Normal school. In consideration of her interests in the hospital, a Palmer room has been designated in honor of Mrs. Eliza Rose Palmer.
   In answer to frequent inquiry, the following information is repeated: private patients requiring ordinary care will be received for from $7 to $ .0 per week. Ward patients including medical attendance $5 per week. Patients of limited means are charged according to their ability to pay, and none is refused admission on account of lack of means.
   The hospital board desires particularly to call the attention of the medical profession of Cortland county and vicinity to the facilities offered for caring for private patients.
   An inspiration of the record of patients treated and operations performed, as there detailed, shows among what may be classed as major operations, those for the removal of cataracts, cancers, the ligation of the femoral artery, amputation of a leg, etc. It is believed that a knowledge of the extent and variety of the work done, will lead to a better appreciation of the advantages afforded by the Cortland hospital to all who come within its shelter and care.
   The cause has been fortunate in enlisting the services of most energetic workers. To these, aided by the generous support of the public, the work of the coming year may safely be committed.
   Lydia H. Cheney,
   Secretary, Hospital Association,
   Cortland. February 3, 1896. 
[Additionally the annual reports of the hospital’s president and treasurer are found on page seven of this issue of the Cortland Standard—CC editor.]