I am writing in response to recent articles in the Cortland Standard – one
regarding the purchase of tablets for elected City officials, the other relating
to the berm project at the Waterworks to alleviate flooding in the City.
Your article on 4/4/12 discussed newly purchased Motorola XY tablets for
the mayor and common council in attempts to cut back on paper and mailing
expenses. No such items were included in the 2012 budget as stated by city
officials. The online City budget shows $500 allocated towards contractual
expenses for the council. Data processing has only $14,000 for all City
equipment, and administration and finance does not have a line for this expense.
During my administration, council approval was necessary to transfer funds
between accounts prior to purchase as required by state law. It would be nice
to know from which line item this purchase came.
The purchase was not
necessary to be in compliance with the state comptroller's audit as stated by
City officials. The comptroller's report concentrated primarily on the need to
consolidate data processing services to a centralized location so that
individual departments discontinue the handling of their own payroll and
procurement. Currently, there is no mechanism in place to assess or review
payroll and expenditures prior to going out.
The amount of paper used
for council packets and associated costs as quoted in the Cortland Standard was
three times more that the actual amount used during my term. Supplements to the
agenda that were too voluminous would be sent by email to the aldermen. I am
not opposed to modernization of City functions, but I do not care for misleading
information being presented to the public as justification.
The article
on 4/6/2 that referenced the berm project was also inaccurate. It implied that
grant funding was required in order to begin construction this summer. This
project was extremely important to me as an alderperson and mayor – as it was
for many of my constituents. Five years ago, common council bonded for the
project based on estimates prepared at that time. Since then, the department of
public works has increased that estimate so that it now exceeds the bonded
$60,000. Last year the City applied for grants that were regrettably
unsuccessful. To insure that this long overdue project would be completed this
year, the necessary funding was included in my 2012 budget. The common council
approved $349,000 to be placed in the contingency account with knowledge that a
portion was to be used towards construction of the berm. It is discouraging
that there was no mention of this fact and that the reader was led to believe
that money was not available.
Sincerely,
Susan Feiszli
Editor's note: This letter was published in the Cortland Standard April 13, 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment