The Cortland Democrat, Friday, April 18,
1890.
PAGE FOUR/EDITORIALS.
The
elections seem to be going all one way. The republicans are unable to find any
comfort in the results. Pile on the tariff.
Only two
newspapermen will be permitted to witness the execution of Kemmler, the wife
murderer, which is to take place next week in Auburn prison. This will be the first execution by electricity
in this country.
Last
winter a bill passed the legislature and became a law fixing the wages of all
laborers on State work at $2 per day. Mr. Deyo of Binghamton introduced a bill
a few weeks ago repealing the law and the bill passed the Assembly last week.
Mr. Peck of Cortland voted in favor of repealing the law.
Thomas Platt |
Concerning Circulation.
The
editor of the Cortland Standard writes very glibly concerning the
circulation of the DEMOCRAT as compared with the circulation of
his own paper and as usual takes a circuitous route to avoid telling the
truth. The controversy may not be very profitable or entertaining to the
readers of either paper, and the DEMOCRAT is not over anxious to parade its business
affairs before the public, although it can always make an exhibit that
it is not ashamed of.
The Standard
says that the DEMOCRAT provoked the discussion. It was the
wolf that charged the lamb with roiling the stream that flowed from the
former to the latter and this is all the answer that the falsehood
requires. The editor of the Standard insists that the amount of
reading matter to the inch is practically the same in both papers;
that trustworthy Republicans had come to him again and again and
told him they were getting the DEMOCRAT for $1.50 a year; that a good
many subscribers to the DEMOCRAT have told him that they have tried to stop
the paper by paying arrearages and ordering it discontinued but without success;
that he had been asked to take the money to pay up and send it in and get a
receipt, and have arranged to have the paper returned if the editor of the DEMOCRAT
insisted on continuing it, and that the Standard prints more foreign
advertisements than the DEMOCRAT and gets more pay for the service.
If the
editor of the Standard was a printer instead of being a blacksmith, he
would know that nearly all the reading matter in his paper is set up in
burgeois type, while the largest type used in the DEMOCRAT is brevier, which is
one size smaller than burgeois. The only correct method of measuring type is
with the regular type measure used in all printing offices. If our neighbor
should undertake to measure up the strings of its compositors with a yard stick
instead of a type measure he would learn the difference quite suddenly.
There
isn't a Republican this side of pandemonium, which is as far as our circulation
extends, who is trustworthy or otherwise, that gets the DEMOCRAT, to our knowledge,
for $1.50 per year or any other sum less than $2. Such a person would be a
genuine curiosity.
There
isn't a Democrat, Republican or Prohibitionist, or any one representing any
other party, creed, sect, nationality or denomination, that can say truthfully,
that he or she ever tried to discontinue taking the DEMOCRAT by paying up and
failed, except possibly a half dozen instances, where there was a
misunderstanding in regard to the intention and in neither of those cases was
the subscriber required to pay where the fault was with the proprietor of this
paper. No subscriber of the DEMOCRAT who wished to discontinue taking the paper
can say that he was ever asked for a reason why he wished to discontinue, nor
can any such person say he was urged or even requested to continue taking the paper.
We make
bold to say that no person belonging to any party, sect, creed or denomination
of any kind, ever asked the editor of the Standard to accept money to be
used in paying for and discontinuing the DEMOCRAT. Our neighbor would have been
delighted to accept the agency and the only regret that he would have felt in the
matter would have been the necessity of parting company with the cash.
It is
true that the Standard prints many more foreign advertisements than the DEMOCRAT
and it is welcome to them. The DEMOCRAT takes only those that are offered at a
fair price, and could have many more of them if it chose to take them, but it does
not believe that it is fair to its home customers to charge them 10 cents per
line each week and give foreign advertisers the same service for less than two
cents per line.
"But
how does the editor of the Standard happen to know just what the
circulation of the DEMOCRAT is?" He has never had an
opportunity, to our knowledge, to examine our books or our subscription
list and yet he seems all of a sudden to have become possessed of
what he evidently thinks is reliable information upon the subject.
For more than fourteen years he has possessed no more knowledge of the
circulation of the DEMOCRAT than we have had or now have of the
circulation of the Standard. Reliable parties have suggested to us that he
virtually owns the post-office in this place [post office was located in the
Standard building—CC editor], that he has had much to do in selecting
the employes therein and that possibly he has secured a list of
subscribers to the DEMOCRAT as they passed through the office.
Unfortunately for him, if this is so, only a portion of the DEMOCRATS list passes
through the post-office here. Most of the towns in the northern part of the county
are supplied by another conveyance. Mr. Ballard, the post-master, is an honest,
reliable man, and although a strong partisan, he would not permit even
the editor of the Standard to handle the mails for an
unworthy purpose if he knew it.
Has the editor of the Standard obtained
the information that he long has sought in a surreptitious and dishonorable
manner? We sincerely hope that he has not placed himself or other
parties in an unfortunate position through his zeal to come in
possession of information that he could not obtain in any other
manner.
In conclusion we have to say that our subscription
list is always open to the inspection of all who have a right to examine it. We
have not the time or inclination to bother with a committee appointed to investigate
our business affairs, simply to furnish a competitor with information that he
has no right to know.
Concerning
Paperlets.
The editor of the Cortland Standard is
greatly disturbed because the Daily Message refuses to give up the ghost and retire from
the field of journalism. The sprightly little daily seems to thrive and grow spunky,
notwithstanding our neighbor predicted its early and not to be lamented decease.
It was thought at first that the unbidden and unwelcome guest would die soon
after its unheralded birth, but instead of accommodating our neighbor in this respect
it keeps on breathing and kicking up its tiny little heels in apparent good health,
and greatly to the discomfort and inconvenience of its more ponderous and logy
neighbor.
True it has not grown greatly in size but
its general health seems to have improved considerably and if the Standard keeps
on firing paper wads at it, we wouldn't be surprised to see it reach much
larger proportions and become a rugged and exceedingly healthy institution. If
it can withstand the shock of the last broadside launched at it, its success
may be considered almost assured. The crime of being a "paperlet,"
whatever the term may mean, must be an enormous one, and all lovers of fair
play and decency will sympathize with the accused and if the charge is not
proven will wish the prisoner a safe and speedy deliverance.
When the editor of the Standard moved
into this county, we supposed that fact was of itself notice to all others to
move out and for none to move in without his permission. He seemed to pre-empt
the territory and mark it for his own. Ordinarily it would be conceded that the
editor [D. S. Jones] of the "paperlet" had the right to "life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness," but of course he must not cast his
lines in the same stream where ye editor of the Standard is angling.
Hereafter proprietors of "paperlets"
will take notice that they will not be permitted to exist within the confines of
the Cortland Standard's bailiwick. People who are not blessed with a
large bank account, will not be permitted to gain an honest livelihood in the Standard's
territory, even though they may be willing to earn the same by the sweat of
their brows. Of course it is a disgrace to be a "paperlet" unless you
are wealthy.
A
Blanket Ballot.
From the Albany Argus.
The enactment of the so called "corrupt
practices" act is thus far the one substantial achievement of the session
in the direction of electoral reform.
Numerous promises have been made that the
general registration bill, which passed the senate almost unanimously, will be passed
by the assembly. If those promises were not buncombe or worse, the general registry
bill will also become the law.
It will then remain for the legislature to
deal with the matter of ballot reform, pure and simple. Three bills, the Linson
bill, the Acker bill, and the "revised" Saxton bill are now before
the legislature. They differ in most respects, but they agree, so far as
observed, in all providing for a "blanket" ballot, that is a ballot containing
the names of all the offices to be filled at a given election. If the legislature
should do nothing more than pass a bill for a blanket ballot to be printed and
distributed as at present substantial progress, we believe, will have been
made. One ballot
containing the names of all the candidates of a party or faction of a party—where
factions exist—has such obvious advantages over the present system of different
ballots for different office that the proposition needs but to be stated to be
accepted. It would meet the convenience of voters, of those who distribute ballots,
and of those who canvass ballots. It would be an economy in the printing and
distribution of ballots, and it would be an economy in the matter of ballot boxes
as well.
But the legislature could go further if it
is still disposed to insist on the "exclusively official ballot."
There is no reason whatever, if that ballot is to be required why it should not
be cut into parts, a Democratic, a Republican, a Prohibition and a labor or
other fourth party ballot, if needed. From among these, furnished by the proper
officer, the voter in the secrecy of the booth could select the one he wishes
to vote and cast it, at the same time handing to the inspector to be destroyed
the ballots he does not vote.
Whether such a change is made or not—and how
fully it meets an objection made by Gov. Hill, will at once be evident—a bill
providing for blanket ballots under the existing law would be cordially approved
by every citizen.
Y.
M. C. A. Elections.
The election of officers for the Y. M. C. A.
for the ensuing year took place at the rooms of the Association in the Standard
building last Monday evening. The following officers were chosen:
President—Dr.
F. W. Higgins.
Vice-President—J.
W. Keese.
Recording
Secretary—J. E. Briggs.
Treasurer—B.
L. Webb.
Gen'l
Secretary—W. A. Kling.
Arrangements for providing funds to sustain
the association for the ensuing year were considered. Anniversary exercises will
be held in the churches next Sunday and will be addressed by excellent speakers
from abroad in the morning. Fine programmes have been provided for the
exercises in the Baptist and Methodist churches in the evening.
No comments:
Post a Comment